Posted on May 25, 2024 by Tom Wade MD
Today, I review, link to, and excerpt from Core IM‘s Cardiorenal Considerations: 5 Pearls Segment. Posted: May 13, 2024
By: Dr. Andrew Ling, Dr. Nayan Arora, Dr. Nicole Bhave and Dr. Shreya P. Trivedi
Graphic: Dr. Rahul Maheshwari
Peer Review: Dr. Larissa Kruger Gomes, Dr. Nisha Bansal
All that follows is from the above resource.
Play Podcastin new window
Time Stamp CME-MOC Show Notes Transcript References
Time Stamps
- 02:05Pearl 1:Make sure the renal dysfunction is not from something else
- 08:47Pearl 2:Practical tidbits on loop diuretics
- 18:08Pearl 3:Assessing diuretic response
- 27:35Pearl 4:Approaching diuretic resistance
- 35:08Pearl 5:Don’t be afraid of medical therapy because of CKD
Sponsor:
Freedis an AI scribe thatlistens, prepares your notes, and writes your note in < 30 seconds.Freedlearns your styleover time and is HIPAA compliant!
Join over6K clinicianswho love Freed and saves themhoursa day!Use the codeCORE50to get 50% off your first month withFreed.
Show Notes
Pearl 1: Make sure the renal dysfunction is actually all cardiorenal!
- How do you define cardiorenal physiology?
- Classic Definition:
- Kidney dysfunction that is related to either a (1)low-flow state and/or (2) renal venous congestion
- BOTH can independentlylead to decreased intrarenal blood flow
- BOTH can lead to neurohormonal activation → Increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity
- These are compensatory mechanisms that initially preserve renal function but can become detrimental when kidney autoregulation can no longer compensate.
- NOTE:Renal venous congestion is thought to be a larger contributor to kidney dysfunction than low-flow states in most cases of cardiorenal syndrome.
- How should you think about the differential for a kidney injury in someone with heart failure?
- Be broad!Multiple processes can happen at the same time
- Urinalysis findings:
- Pure cardiorenal syndrome
- “Bland” with no protein, blood, granular or other cell casts
- May have hyaline casts
- No signs of intrinsic injury!
- NOTE:Screen for proteinuria in heart failure patients!
- Urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR)or
- Urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR)
- Dilute urine can falsely lower proteinuriaon a urine dipstick!
Pearl 2:Practical Tidbits on Loop Diuretics
- What is the “go-to” loop diuretic for someone who is hospitalized for volume overload?
- Intravenous therapy!
- Because gut edema may interfere with oral absorption
- Dosing:
- 2.5 times their equivalent daily oral home dose of diuretic
- Benefits of this dosing:
- Better decongestion at 72 hours
- Faster transition back to oral diuretics
- Compared tolowerIV doses
- Continuous vs. Bolus dosing?
- No difference in outcomes!
- NOTE:Patients being treated with bolusmayrequire more escalations in dosing during their hospitalization
- What are the differences between loop diuretics?
- IV formulations:
- Furosemide vs. Bumetanide
- No difference in outcomes demonstrated
- But not largely studied!
- Bumetanide Considerations:
- More potent
- Practitioners may be more comfortable with using higher equivalent doses since bumetanide doses are in the single digits
- Severe myalgiaswith IV bumetanide as a continuous infusion
- Especially with higher doses
- Unclear if unique to bumetanide or if purely dose-related given furosemide is not typically used at equally high equivalent doses
- PO formulations:
- Furosemide vs. Torsemide vs. Bumetanide
- Conversions (PO): Furosemide 40 mg = torsemide 20 mg = bumetanide 1 mg
- Considerations when choosing PO:
- Bioavailability
- Furosemide
- Torsemide & Bumetanide
- Duration of action
- Torsemide (6-16 hours) > furosemide (6-8 hours) > bumetanide (4-6 hours)
- NOTE:Torsemide can be dosedone daily,whereas
- Bumetanide should be dosed at leasttwice daily!
- Torsemide is preferred over furosemide since it is more predictable!
- Caveat:TheTRANSFORM-HF trialdid not show significant difference in outcomes between torsemide and furosemide
- However, there are many criticisms of the trial!
- Significant crossover
- Use of mortality as the primary outcome rather than other metrics
Pearl 3: Assessing Diuretic Response and Renal Function
- How to assess diuretic response?
- Traditional assessment:
- Weights
- Exam findings
- Urine output
- Challenges with relying on these:
- Inaccurate documentation and/or
- Delay in diuretic titration
- In case of inadequate response
- Alternative assessment:
- Spot urine sodium (UNa) level
- Measures diuretic responsiveness
- Quick assessment 1-2 hours after administering loop diuretic
- Interpretation:
- UNa < 50-100 mEq/L → poor responseto the current dose of loop diuretic
- GOAL:>70 mEq/L
- For an appropriate response
- Causes offalsely highspot UNa:
- Low volume of urine
- Metabolic alkalosis
- Medications (ex. piperacillin-tazobactam)
- Causes offalsely lowspot UNa:
- Cirrhosis
- High volume of urine
- NOTE:Using a spoturine sodiumAND6-hour urine output-guided protocolto escalate loop diuretic dosing was feasible
- What do you do if the response to diuretic is not adequate?
- Double your loop diuretic dose
- Start a drip (if at maximum dose)
- Reassess initial diagnosis or if new insult!
- What happens to creatinine during diuresis?
- Generally safe to see up to 30% rise in from baseline levels with active decongestion
- Known as “rise in serum creatinine” (RSC)or”worsening renal function” (WRF)
- Usually does NOT reflect true renal tubular injury
- Even though this threshold is how acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined
- Rise is a result of:
- Hemodynamic or functional change in glomerular filtration
- Hemoconcentration of creatinine
- Alone, should NOT be a reason to stop diuresing a volume overload patient
- NOTE:Mortalityactually worse for patient’s whose serum creatinine “improved”from baseline compared to those who had “worsening” levels.
- The rise has nopredictive value for rehospitalization or mortalityunless patients also had other signs of congestion at discharge
- Still, always still do the due diligence each day!
- Volume assessment
- Urine output monitoring
- Consider need to evaluate for another cause of rising serum creatinine
- Consider more sophisticated and/or invasive measures of volume status
- Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)
- Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS)
- Right heart catheterization
Pearl 4: How to approach diuretic resistance
- What is diuretic resistance?
- Failure to achieve therapeutically desired congestion reliefdespite using appropriate or escalating doses of diuretics.
- Consider…Is something else going on?
- Diuretics cannot work if they are not reaching the kidney!
- Some factors to consider:
- Shock
- Low-flow state
- Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (ascites)
- How can you augment your diuresis?
- Sequential nephron blockade!
- Thiazide or Thiazide-Like Diuretics:
- PO Metolazone vs. IV Chlorothiazide (or Diuril)
- Metolazone
- Less expensive
- Metolazone has amuch longer half-life and duration of actioncompared to chlorothiazide
- Chlorothiazide
- More expensive (cost is starting to come down)
- NOTE:Many clinicians anecdotally prefer chlorothiazide because of faster onset and IV administration
- Effect:
- No significant difference between twoin terms of urine output measured at 24-48 hours.
- Alternative adjusts:
- Hydrochlorothiazide or Chlorthalidone
- Reasonable options though more in outpatient setting
- Commonly used as antihypertensives
- Acetazolamide
- Achievessuccessful decongestion and shortening length of stay
- Without any differences in safety outcomes!
- In practice:Considered especially in cases of worsening metabolic alkalosis or in COPD
- Caution when using if there is acidosis or serum bicarbonate is low!
- Acute SGLT2i
- Not well-established adjunct
- (though beneficial in general andmay be safe to add during heart failure hospitalizations post-AKI)
- Hypertonic saline
- Not well-established adjunct
- What should be monitored during diuresis?
- Electrolytes, particularly hypokalemia
- More common with augmentation
- Hypokalemia is an independent risk factor fordevelopment of diuretic resistance
- Add potassium-sparing diuretics early!
- Long-term benefit
- Rapid Volume Depletion
- What about ultrafiltration (UF)?
- CARRESS-HF Trial
- Stepped diuretic algorithm was superior to starting with ultrafiltration
- Preserved renal function
- Lower rates of adverse events
- Criticisms:
- May not be realistic (diuresis was not attempted in UF group)
- Unclear if ideal rate of UF was used
- In practice: UFonlyafter a failing maximal medical therapy
- Due to concerns about future renal function when starting HD and dialysis access complications
Pearl 5:Don’t be afraid of medical therapy because of CKD
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure
- Also arekey medical therapies that slow progression of CKD!
- Benefit of medications seen in patients with:
- Proteinuric CKD (estimated albuminuria > 300 mg/day) with or without diabetes
- GDMT meds areheavily underutilizedin patients with concomitant heart failure and CKD
- Despite worse outcomes!
- Percent of patients of GDMT (RAAS inhibition, MRA, beta blocker) by eGFR at discharge
- eGFR 30-45 →only15% of patients!
- eGFR < 30→only5% of patients!
- NOTE:Data from 2014-2019 heart failure registry
- Before SGLT2 inhibitors became an established pillar in heart failure and CKD
- How should you start GDMT in advanced CKD?
- Expect an initial decline in eGFR based on creatinine
- When starting RAAS inhibitors and/or SGLT2 inhibitors
- But don’t panic!
- Decline is usually reflective of:
- Glomerular hemodynamic changes
- Reduction of pathologic hyperfiltration
- Decline is associated with:
- Better outcomes
- Slower annual eGFR decline afterwards
- SGLT2i studies
- General Advice:Tolerate up to a 30% reduction in eGFRafter initiation as declines in eGFR larger than 30% are unusual with these agents!
- RAAS Inhibitors
- Tips & Tricks
- RAAS inhibitors shouldNOTbe stopped solely because of declining eGFR
- STOP-ACE Trial –no significant difference in trajectory of GFR decline or number of patients started on RRTwhen stopping vs. continuing RAS inhibitors at eGFR < 30
- Signal towards worse cardiovascular outcomes, however, when these agents are stopped.
- Hyperkalemia IS more of a reason to pause – but consider trying to treat the potassium first!
- SGLT2 inhibitors are also protective against hyperkalemia – even more reason to have them on board if not already!
- Consider adding potassium binders (see our episode onhyperkalemia in CKD).
- SGLT2 Inhibitors
- Tips & Tricks
- Currently approved forinitiation at eGFR > 20
- EMPA-CKD Trial
- Subgroup analyses of DAPA-CKD Trial
- There are ongoing trials where people are being safely continued on these agents even through dialysis!
- SGLT2 inhibitors can likely be continued safely even if eGFR eventually declines to < 20!
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA)
- Tips & Tricks
- All MRAs:
- Improved cardiovascular outcomes and mortality
- At leastobservational data that they may improve renal outcomesover the long-term
- NOTE:It is stillextremely important to closely monitor for dangerous potassium issuesand kidney function especially when initiating any MRA!
- Finerenone:
- New agent on the block!
- Slows CKD progressionin patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuric CKD in randomized setting (FIDELIO-DKD)
- Non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
- More selective for the mineralocorticoid receptor
- Compared to more familiar agents like spironolactone or eplerenone (which are steroidal MRAs)
- Reduced rates of hyperkalemia
- Compared with steroidal MRAs
- Also improves cardiovascular outcomes like the other MRAs (primarily by reduced heart failure hospitalizations)
This entry was posted in Acute Heart Failure, CoreIM, CoreIM Podcast, Diuretics, Heart Failure. Bookmark the permalink.